1. Academic Validation
  2. Mitochondrial Fragmentation Induced by the CFTR Modulators Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor in Immortalized Cystic Fibrosis Cell Lines

Mitochondrial Fragmentation Induced by the CFTR Modulators Lumacaftor and Ivacaftor in Immortalized Cystic Fibrosis Cell Lines

  • Cells. 2025 Oct 15;14(20):1601. doi: 10.3390/cells14201601.
Camila Dib 1 Pablo A Iglesias González 1 María de Los Ángeles Aguilar 1 Guillermo L Taminelli 2 Tatiana Limpias Del Valle 1 Nadia E Nuñez 1 Analía G Karadayian 1 Tomás A Santa-Coloma 1 Ángel G Valdivieso 1 2
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Biology, Institute for Biomedical Research (BIOMED), School of Medical Sciences, Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina (UCA), National Scientific and Technical Research Council of Argentina (CONICET), Alicia Moreau de Justo 1600, Buenos Aires 1107, Argentina.
  • 2 School of Engineering and Agrarian Sciences (FICA), Pontifical Catholic University of Argentina (UCA), Buenos Aires 1107, Argentina.
Abstract

Cystic fibrosis (CF) is an autosomal recessive disease caused by mutations in the CFTR gene, which encodes a cAMP-activated Chloride Channel essential for epithelial function. Beyond its canonical role, evidence suggests CFTR also influences mitochondrial function. Previous studies have identified CFTR- and Cl-dependent genes, including MTND4 and CISD1, which are downregulated in CF cells and play a critical role in mitochondrial function. CF cells exhibit altered mitochondrial complex I (mCx-I) activity and impaired electron transport chain function, although the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. In this study, the impact of the CFTR modulators lumacaftor (VX-809) and ivacaftor (VX-770) on mitochondrial morphology and function was investigated in heterozygous ΔF508/W1282X CF IB3-1 cells. Combined treatment with VX-809 (10 μM, CFTR corrector) and VX-770 (0.1 μM, CFTR potentiator) induced a fragmented mitochondrial morphology in both CF and CF expressing wt-CFTR cells, without affecting cell viability or mitochondrial membrane potential (ΔΨm). While individual treatments differentially modulated ROS production and ΔΨm, these effects were not statistically significant under combined treatment. These results highlight a previously unrecognized role for CFTR modulators in shaping mitochondrial morphology. A better understanding of these effects may reveal novel mechanisms underlying the regulation of mitochondrial structure and function.

Keywords

CFTR; ivacaftor; lumacaftor; mitochondrial morphology.

Figures
Products
Inhibitors & Agonists