1. Academic Validation
  2. Oligomerization and interacellular localization of the glycoprotein receptor ERGIC-53 is independent of disulfide bonds

Oligomerization and interacellular localization of the glycoprotein receptor ERGIC-53 is independent of disulfide bonds

  • J Mol Biol. 2005 Dec 2;354(3):556-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jmb.2005.09.077.
Etienne P A Neve 1 Ulla Lahtinen Ralf F Pettersson
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research, Stockholm Branch, Karolinska Institutet, Box 240, S-17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Abstract

ERGIC-53 is a type I transmembrane lectin facilitating the efficient export of a subset of secretory glycoproteins from the endoplasmic reticulum. Previous results have shown that ERGIC-53 is present as reduction-sensitive homo-oligomers, i.e. as a balanced mixture of disulfide-linked hexamers and dimers, with the two cysteine residues located close to the transmembrane domain playing a crucial role in oligomerization. Here, we demonstrate, using sucrose gradient sedimentation, cross-linking analyses, and non-denaturing gel electrophoresis, that ERGIC-53 is present exclusively as a hexameric complex in cells. However, the hexamers exist in two forms, one as a disulfide-linked, Triton X-100, perfluoro-octanic acid, and SDS-resistant complex, and the Other as a non-covalent, Triton X-100, perfluoro-octanoic acid-resistant, but SDS-sensitive, complex made up of three disulfide-linked dimers that are likely to interact through the coiled-coil domains present in the luminal part of the protein. In contrast to what was previously believed, neither of the membrane-proximal cysteine residues plays an essential role in the formation, or maintenance, of the latter form of hexamers. Subcellular fractionation revealed that the double-cysteine mutant was present in the endoplasmic reticulum-Golgi-intermediate compartment, indicating that the two cysteine residues are not essential for the intracellular distribution of ERGIC-53. Based on these results, we present a model for the formation of the two hexameric forms.

Figures