1. Academic Validation
  2. Fatal haemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Ena and identification of a novel GYPA c.295delG variant in a Thai family

Fatal haemolytic transfusion reaction due to anti-Ena and identification of a novel GYPA c.295delG variant in a Thai family

  • Vox Sang. 2022 Nov;117(11):1327-1331. doi: 10.1111/vox.13358.
Ploymanee Suwanwootichai 1 Genghis H Lopez 2 3 Morakot Emthip 1 Brett Wilson 4 Glenda M Millard 2 4 Sunisa Onpuns 5 Kanchana Laemsri 5 Sasitorn Bejrachandra 6 Yew-Wah Liew 4
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Red Cell Reference Laboratory, National Blood Centre, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • 2 Research and Development, Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • 3 School of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of the Sunshine Coast, Sippy Downs, Queensland, Australia.
  • 4 Red Cell Reference Laboratory, Clinical Services and Research, Australian Red Cross Lifeblood, Kelvin Grove, Queensland, Australia.
  • 5 Transfusion Medicine Unit, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • 6 National Blood Centre, Thai Red Cross Society, Bangkok, Thailand.
Abstract

Background and objectives: High-frequency antigen Ena (MNS 28) is expressed on glycophorin A (GPA). En(a-) individuals can form anti-Ena when exposed to GPA. A Thai patient formed an antibody that reacted against all reagent red blood cells (RBCs). The patient received incompatible blood resulting in a fatal haemolytic transfusion reaction (HTR). This study aimed to characterize the antibody detected in the patient and investigate the cause of HTR.

Materials and methods: Blood samples from the patient and three of his family members were investigated. Massively parallel Sequencing (MPS) and DNA-microarray were used for genotyping. Standard haemagglutination techniques were used for phenotyping and antibody investigations.

Results: DNA Sequencing showed the patient was homozygous for GYPA*M c.295delG (p.Val99Ter) predicting En(a-). Three family members were heterozygous for GYPA c.295delG. MPS and DNA-microarray predicted the patient was N- discordant with the N+ RBC phenotype. The patient's plasma was positive with enzyme/chemical-treated reagent RBCs but failed to react with En(a-) and Mk Mk RBCs.

Conclusion: The GYPA c.295delG variant prevented GPA expression on RBCs resulting in En(a-) phenotype. The N+ phenotype result was probably due to the anti-N typing reagent detecting 'N' (MNS30) on GPB. The patient's alloantibody has anti-Ena specificity.

Keywords

En(a−); Ena (MNS28); MNS blood group system; anti-Ena antibody; haemolytic transfusion reaction.

Figures
Products