1. Academic Validation
  2. An Assessment of Physical and N6-Cyclohexyladenosine-Induced Hypothermia in Rodent Distal Focal Ischemic Stroke

An Assessment of Physical and N6-Cyclohexyladenosine-Induced Hypothermia in Rodent Distal Focal Ischemic Stroke

  • Ther Hypothermia Temp Manag. 2024 Mar;14(1):36-45. doi: 10.1089/ther.2023.0025.
Lane J Liddle 1 Yi-Ge Huang 2 Tiffany F C Kung 1 Philipp Mergenthaler 2 3 4 Frederick Colbourne 1 5 Alastair M Buchan 2 3
Affiliations

Affiliations

  • 1 Department of Psychology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
  • 2 Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
  • 3 Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Center for Stroke Research Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • 4 Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Department of Neurology with Experimental Neurology, NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany.
  • 5 Neuroscience and Mental Health Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Abstract

Therapeutic hypothermia (TH) mitigates damage in ischemic stroke models. However, safer and easier TH methods (e.g., pharmacological) are needed to circumvent physical cooling complications. This study evaluated systemic and pharmacologically induced TH using the adenosine A1 receptor agonist, N6-cyclohexyladenosine (CHA), with control groups in male Sprague-Dawley rats. CHA was administered intraperitoneally 10 minutes following a 2-hour intraluminal middle cerebral artery occlusion. We used a 1.5 mg/kg induction dose, followed by three 1.0 mg/kg doses every 6 hours for a total of 4 doses, causing 20-24 hours of hypothermia. Animals assigned to physical hypothermia and CHA-hypothermia had similar induction rates and nadir temperatures, but forced cooling lasted ∼6 hours longer compared with CHA-treated Animals. The divergence is likely attributable to individual differences in CHA metabolism, which led to varied durations at nadir, whereas physical hypothermia was better regulated. Physical hypothermia significantly reduced infarction (primary endpoint) on day 7 (mean reduction of 36.8 mm3 or 39% reduction; p = 0.021 vs. normothermic animals; Cohen's d = 0.75), whereas CHA-induced hypothermia did not (p = 0.33). Similarly, physical cooling improved neurological function (physical hypothermia median = 0, physical normothermia median = 2; p = 0.008) and CHA-induced cooling did not (p > 0.99). Our findings demonstrate that forced cooling was neuroprotective compared with controls, but prolonged CHA-induced cooling was not neuroprotective.

Keywords

N6-cyclohexyladenosine; middle cerebral artery occlusion; neuroprotection; rodent model; therapeutic hypothermia.

Figures
Products