1. Academic Validation
  2. Pseudo-DNA damage response in senescent cells

Pseudo-DNA damage response in senescent cells

  • Cell Cycle. 2009 Dec 15;8(24):4112-8. doi: 10.4161/cc.8.24.10215.
Tatyana V Pospelova 1 Zoya N Demidenko Elena I Bukreeva Valery A Pospelov Andrei V Gudkov Mikhail V Blagosklonny
Affiliations

Affiliation

  • 1 Institute of Cytology, Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia. tvpgroup@mail.ru
Abstract

Cellular senescence is currently viewed as a response to DNA damage. In this report, we showed that non-damaging agents such as sodium butyrate-induced p21 and ectopic expression of either p21 or p16 cause cellular senescence without detectable DNA breaks. Nevertheless, senescent cells displayed components of DNA damage response (DDR) such as gammaH2AX foci and uniform nuclear staining for p-ATM. Importantly, there was no accumulation of 53BP1 in gammaH2AX foci of senescent cells. Consistently, comet assay failed to detect DNA damage. Rapamycin, an inhibitor of mTO R, which was shown to suppress cellular senescence, decreased gammaH2AX foci formation. Thus, cellular senescence leads to activation of atypical DDR without detectable DNA damage. Pseudo-DDR may be a marker of general over-activation of senescent cells.

Figures